主动和反应性风险管理之间的差异

Key Difference- Proactive vs Reactive Risk Management

Before reading about the difference between proactive and reactive risk management, let us first look at what风险管理就是全部。Errorsare common in any work environment. Such errors may occur due to human mistakes, unexpected accidents, natural disasters and third party decisions which affect the organization. Such errors can be either avoidable or unavoidable. The plan of minimizing such errors and mitigating its effects during an incident is known as risk management. This involves the identification, assessment and prioritization of risks. Theobjective风险管理的是偏转业务不确定性的影响。现在让我们专注于主动和反应性风险管理。但是，两者都有相同的目标，风险的过程和识别可以区分这两种风险管理方式。这key differencebetween proactive and reactive risk management is that thereactive risk management is a responsebased风险management approach, which isdependent on accident evaluation and audit based findingswhile主动风险管理是基于测量和观察的自适应，闭环反馈控制策略。

什么是反应性风险管理？

反应性风险管理通常与消防方案进行比较。反应性风险管理事故发生或发现问题一旦发生行动after theaudit。这accident is investigated, and measures are taken to avoid similar events happening in the future. Further, measures will be taken to reduce the negative impact the incident could cause on business profitability and sustainability.

反应性风险管理对所有以前的事故进行了编目，并记录了它们以找到导致事故的错误。建议通过反应性风险管理方法采取预防措施并实施。This is the earlier model of risk management. Reactive risk management can cause serious delays in a workplace due to the unpreparedness for new accidents. The unpreparedness makes the resolving process complex as the cause of accident needs investigation and solution involve high cost, plus extensive modification.

什么是主动风险管理？

与反应性风险管理相反，主动风险管理试图在事件发生之前确定所有相关风险。当前的组织必须应对由技术进步，放松管制，激烈的竞争和日益增加的公众关注引起的快速环境变化时代。因此，依靠过去事件的风险管理对于任何组织而言都是不错的选择。因此，有必要在风险管理中进行新的思维，这为主动风险管理铺平了道路。

Proactive risk management can be defined as “Adaptive, closed loop feedback control strategy based on measurement, observation of the present safety level and planned explicit target safety level with a creative intellectuality”. The definition relates to the flexibility and creative intellectual power of humans who have a high sense of safety concern. Though, humans are the source of error, they can also be a very important safety source as per proactive risk management. Further, the closed loop strategy refers to setting up of boundaries to operate within. These boundaries are considered to have safe performance level.

偶然的分析是主动的一部分风险management, with which accident scenarios are built and the key employees andstakeholders谁可能会发现事故的错误。因此，过去的事故在主动风险管理中也很重要。

What is the between Proactive and Reactive Risk Management?

现在，我们将研究两种风险管理方法之间的差异。

Definition of主动和反应性风险管理

反应性：“A response based risk management approach, which is dependent on accident evaluation and audit based findings.”

Proactive:“基于测量，对当前安全水平的观察以及计划的明确目标安全水平的自适应，闭环反馈控制策略，具有创造性的知识。”

积极主动和反应性风险管理的目的

反应性风险管理：Reactive risk management attempts to reduce the tendency of the same or similar accidents which happened in past being repeated in future.

Proactive risk management:积极的风险管理试图通过确定违反边界的活动的边界来减少未来发生的任何事故的趋势。

主动和反应风险管理的功能

Timeframe

反应性风险管理：Reactive risk management solely depends on past accidental analysis and response.

Proactive risk management:积极的风险管理结合了过去，现在和将来的预测的混合方法，然后才能找到解决方案以避免风险。

Flexibility

反应性风险管理：Reactive risk management does not accommodate预言,creativity, and problem-solving ability of humans in its approach which makes it less flexible to changes and challenges.

Proactive risk management:Proactive risk management includescreative thinking, prediction. Further, it principally depends on the accident source to reduce the accident which is a human attribute. So, this lets it be very adaptive to changing environment.

Here, we have detailed the description of proactive and reactive risk management and the differences in between the two risk management approach. Proactive risk management is more advisable and is being adapted by present organizations.

Image Courtesy:

“Risk Management Elements”.(Public Domain)viaWikimedia Commons