保守主义与自由主义
Conservatism and Liberalism are two types of schools of thought that showed tremendous difference between them. Liberalism believes in the significance of自由和平等权利。另一方面,保守主义试图促进传统机构的维护。换句话说,它旨在保护传统。This is the main difference between the two schools of thought. Based on these main differences, conservatism and liberalism has many more different characteristics. Edmund Burke is known as the father of conservatism. Meanwhile, John Locke is considered as the first person to develop a liberal philosophy. Let us see some more information about these two ideologies.
什么是保守主义?
Conservatism aims at the preservation of things as they are and thus they are not for any kind of change when it comes to the functioning of things. Conservatism is looked upon as an态度。它没有被视为哲学。它被认为是有助于社会发展的恒定力量。保守主义被视为ideology在过去的一些思想家中。
到目前为止,人们已经知道了几种保守主义的变体。它们包括自由保守主义,自由主义者保守主义,财政保守主义,绿色保守主义,文化保守主义,社会保守主义和宗教保守主义。
如今的保守主义期望政府充当小型机构,允许对每个人的个人责任更多。保守主义不希望政府解决所有问题,而是认为每个人都应该在解决问题方面承担更多责任。
Some examples of the traditional views of conservatism are here. For example, conservatism believes that abortion is not acceptable. It upholds the traditional value that a baby conceived is equal to an already functioning and living human being. Also, conservatism does not agree with安乐死。保守主义拒绝相信让一个疾病的人自杀是道德的。到那个时刻death penalty,持有保守主义思想的人认为,这是对杀害另一个人的罪行的应有惩罚。这是传统的信念,即惩罚应适合犯罪。
What is Liberalism?
自由主义相信自由和平等。它认为,政治机构或宗教的政府干预应最少或没有政府干预,因为这些地区应该是任何人可以自由参与的领域。同样,自由主义期望政府确保人们拥有平等的权利。
应该说,自由主义将各种智力趋势和学校联系起来。重要的是要知道两种自由主义在全球范围内广为人知。Classical liberalism在18世纪广为人知,而社会自由主义在20世纪变得非常流行。另一方面,自由主义哲学被使用美国革命与法国大革命。这仅意味着自由主义被视为一种哲学。
自由主义的主要关注点是发展世界免于政府干预,或者,如果完全不可能,那么它将旨在减轻政府干预。自由主义坚信政府正在绊倒个人的成功,因此他们希望政府远离个人生活。此外,自由主义支持诸如立宪主义,自由民主,人权和宗教自由之类的基本思想。
一些自由主义的例子在这里。例如,自由主义认为堕胎是可以接受的。它坚持一个女人有权按自己的身体做出决定,而胎儿不是一个活着的人。此外,自由主义同意安乐死。自由主义认为,即使是绝症的人,如果他或她愿意,他也有尊严地死亡。看,这是自由and freedom做一个人想要的事情。关于死刑,持有自由主义思想的人认为,死刑并不是对杀害另一个人的罪行的应有惩罚。自由主义认为,每个死刑都有杀死无辜者的机会。
What is the difference between Conservatism and Liberalism?
•保守主义和自由主义的信仰:
•保守主义相信保留传统价值观。他们反对可能破坏事物现在的变化。
•自由主义相信自由和平等。他们相信每个人都应该有权自由生活,政府应确保赋予所有人平等的权利。
• 政府:
•保守主义喜欢政府的干预,但希望政府规模较小,以便对公民承担更多的个人责任。
• Liberalism does not like government intervention. However, it expects the government to make sure the rights of people are protected.
• Types:
•保守主义的类型是自由主义的保守主义,自由主义者保守主义,财政保守主义,绿色保守主义,文化保守主义,社会保守主义和宗教保守主义。
•自由主义的类型是古典自由主义和社会自由主义。
Images Courtesy:埃德蒙·伯克(Edmund Burke)and约翰·洛克通过Wikicommons(公共领域)
冷的帕特里奥特说
“自由主义的主要关注点是发展世界免于政府干预,或者如果完全不可能,那么它将旨在减轻政府干预。自由主义坚信政府正在绊倒个人的成功,因此他们希望政府远离个人生活。”
自第二次世界大战以来,“自由主义”并非如此。自由主义者现在公开站在大国一边。
Derp说
那他们不是自由主义者。这实际上是矛盾的。
Purplelitics说
This is wrong at least as it applies to the United States! Liberals believe is state control thus sacrificing individual rights for the “greater good” while Conservatives prioritize the rights of individuals, personal responsibility, and smaller government with limited powers. The “greater good” argument has proven a fallacy because of the self preservation and competitive characteristics of human nature.
Erinna说
我们经常在美国称之为“自由主义者”或“进步主义者”的人实际上只是左派主义者(通常是马克思主义者或其他某种形式的“左翼”)或福利国家的自由主义者。他们偏离了古典自由主义和自由主义者,这些团体实际上与美国保守主义重叠。无论出于何种原因,我们继续称它们为“自由主义者”,并成为保守派使用的贬义词。真正的自由主义者实际上是大多数保守派都能相处的类型。
TT说
您描述了保守主义,因为他们相信“更大的好处”,并根据他们的个人观点和观点保留它。然后,您想将保守主义归因于自由主义。哈哈!如果您认为自由主义者是关于“更大的好处”,同时牺牲了个人权利和自由,那么显然您不知道保守主义不是自由主义的意思。然后,您想更改定义,因为您要成为保守派,而您实际上想要自由主义。哈哈!您很困惑,显然。此页面上的定义是真实和真实的,并且已经被那些对这两个想法受过教育和了解的人所理解。
Deborah说
What is Fair & Right for the Good of All Individuals vs what is Fair & Right for the Chosen Few!
约瑟夫·凯泽(Joseph Kezer)说
Deborah. Who are the “Chosen Few”?
TT说
右翼保守派选择改变同意的定义,以便他们可以使自己更好地侵害所有人的个人权利和自由。如果您不喜欢或同意自由主义的定义,那很好。对您而言,不正确的是更改定义以更好地适合您的意见。美国右翼政治希望将“大政府”的缺乏归因于左派自由派。那绝对是BS。自由主义者更喜欢政府保护个人权利和自由,并确保所有人/每个人都拥有相同的权利和保护。这与想要“大政府”一样。
例子中,保守党希望大政府impose their moral beliefs that an abortion is wrong, and that government should impose punishment on a woman who makes that choice. Liberals prefer to allow the individual woman to make her own choice and decision regarding her pregnancy. In this case, it the Conservatives who want that BIG GOVERNMENT to intervene and take away an individual woman’s right to free choice and freedom to do what she wants with her body. Liberals want government to not dictate what a woman must choose, rather, Liberals want to protect the woman’s right to make her own choices.
Conservatives are not comfortable knowing that while they want their own individual rights and freedoms, well, those same rights and freedoms should not be given to others who do not share their own personal religious and/or moral beliefs. That’s why the conservatives commenting here, and all over our country, keep trying to redefine what a “Liberal” is, so that they can attack those people who truly value individual right and freedom and protection. Conservatives use big government to force others to believe as they do, and if they do not, then they want big government to punish those who exercise and fight for their rights and freedoms. Most conservatives are quite confused about what they really know about themselves. The basic definitions on this page are true, even though Conservatives clearly don’t want them to be, as they try to change the definitions, to yet again, control what others should believe, be, do and not do. Conservatism is counter to the pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for the individual.